Loss of Parental Consortium in Personal Injury Cases
In the words of the Texas Supreme Court, "The loss of a parent's love, care,
companionship and guidance can severely impact a child's development and
have a major influence on a child's welfare and personality throughout
life." For this reason, some states have recognized a child's right to
recover for loss of parental consortium in personal injury actions.
"Consortium" typically encompasses love, companionship, affection, society,
solace and comfort.
Significant Variation Among Jurisdictions
The status of the law with respect to a child's right to recover consortium
damages varies significantly among states. In fact, the variation is so
considerable that it is virtually impossible to set forth a generalized
summary on the status of the law. Instead, examples of state treatment of
the issue are offered to illustrate the great variety of approaches to
awarding parental consortium damages.
Among the significant issues that courts must address are the following:
Whether a child's right to recover parental consortium damages is limited to
wrongful death actions. For example, some states only authorize consortium
damages in cases where the parent dies. Other states, however, additionally
allow consortium damages in cases where the parent survives with severe
injuries. This article focuses exclusively on the situation where the
parent suffers non-fatal injuries.
Whether recovery is limited to minor children. Some states only permit
minor children to receive an award of consortium damages, while other states
grant adult children the right to bring claims for loss of parental
State Approaches to Parental Consortium Damages
In November 2002, the Tennessee Supreme Court conducted a survey of the
decisions of other state courts. According to the court's research, a
majority of jurisdictions had refused to recognize a cause of action for
loss of parental consortium in personal injury cases. In fact, American
courts had unanimously rejected the claim until the Supreme Judicial Court
of Massachusetts first recognized it in 1980.
Alternatively, the Tennessee court observed that a minority of states had
adopted an action for loss of parental consortium. Those that have adopted
the action did so either through statutory enactment (i.e., the state
legislature) or through case law and judicial opinions:
Massachusetts allows a child, if conceived before a parent sustains
non-fatal injuries, to recover for loss of the parent's consortium after his
birth. Furthermore, a minor child may recover for loss of a parent's
companionship and society due to injuries negligently inflicted on the
parent by a third party.
In 1990, the Supreme Court of Texas granted children the right to recover
for loss of consortium in situations where the parent suffers a permanent
disability: "The obvious and unquestionable significance of the parent-child
relationship compels our recognition of a cause of action for loss of
parental consortium." Later, in 2003, the court affirmed the validity of a
child's consortium claim for a parent's serious permanent injury. Texas,
moreover, does not limit the right to recover to minor children: "Although
minors are the group most likely to suffer real harm due to a disruption of
the parent-child relationship, we leave this to the jury to consider in
Florida has set forth a statute that includes loss of companionship as
compensation for a minor child in a claim for permanent injury to a parent.
In Michigan, a child has a cause of action for loss of parental consortium
resulting from non-fatal injury to the parent.
Subject to certain limitations, Arizona permits children to recover for loss
of consortium "when a third party causes serious, permanent, and disabling
injury to their parent." Like Texas, Arizona does not limit recovery to
minor children: "A defendant in a consortium case is liable to the child
because the defendant injured the child's parent and thereby damaged the
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has recognized a right to recover for loss of
consortium "when for all practical purposes the parent is in a state which
The Supreme Court of Washington, in 1984, granted both adult and minor
children the right to recover for loss of parental consortium. In
Washington, the child's age is only relevant as a factor in assessing the
amount of damages.
A Louisiana statute permits the recovery of parental consortium damages in
personal injury cases.
This website is designed for general information only. The information
presented at this site should not be construed to be be formal legal advice
from Clinton & McKain, P.C. nor the formation of a lawyer-client
relationship between yourself and Clinton & McKain, P.C.